mirror of
https://github.com/freqtrade/freqtrade.git
synced 2024-11-10 10:21:59 +00:00
parent
7f434c0413
commit
97351c95c0
16
docs/faq.md
16
docs/faq.md
|
@ -136,6 +136,22 @@ On Windows, the `--logfile` option is also supported by Freqtrade and you can us
|
|||
> type \path\to\mylogfile.log | findstr "something"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Why does freqtrade not have GPU support?
|
||||
|
||||
First of all, most indicator libraries don't have GPU support - as such, there would be little benefit for indicator calculations.
|
||||
The GPU improvements would only apply to pandas-native calculations - or ones written by yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
For hyperopt, freqtrade is using scikit-optimize, which is built on top of scikit-learn.
|
||||
Their statement about GPU support is [pretty clear](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/faq.html#will-you-add-gpu-support).
|
||||
|
||||
GPU's also are only good at crunching numbers (floating point operations).
|
||||
For hyperopt, we need both number-crunching (find next parameters) and running python code (running backtesting).
|
||||
As such, GPU's are not too well suited for most parts of hyperopt.
|
||||
|
||||
The benefit of using GPU would therefore be pretty slim - and will not justify the complexity introduced by trying to add GPU support.
|
||||
|
||||
There is however nothing preventing you from using GPU-enabled indicators within your strategy if you think you must have this - you will however probably be disappointed by the slim gain that will give you (compared to the complexity).
|
||||
|
||||
## Hyperopt module
|
||||
|
||||
### How many epochs do I need to get a good Hyperopt result?
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user