In a combination with a wallet size of 1 billion it should never be able to run out of money avoiding false-positives of some users who just wanted to test a strategy without actually checking how the stake_amount-variable should be used in combination with the strategy-function custom_stake_amount.
reason: some strategies demand a custom_stake_amount of 1$ demanding a very large wallet-size (which already was set previously)
Others start with 100% of a slot size and subdivide the base-orders and safety-orders down to finish at 100% of a slot-size and use unlimited stake_amount.
Edited docs to reflect that change.
In a combination with a wallet size of 1 billion it should never be able to run out of money avoiding false-positives of some users who just wanted to test a strategy without actually checking how the stake_amount-variable should be used in combination with the strategy-function custom_stake_amount
reason: some strategies demand a custom_stake_amount of 1$ demanding a very large wallet-size (which already was set previously)
Others start with 100% of a slot size and subdivide the base-orders and safety-orders down to finish at 100% of a slot-size and use unlimited stake_amount.
Edited docs to reflect that change too
- moved doc from utils.md to lookahead-analysis.md and modified it (unfinished)
- added a check to automatically edit the config['backtest_cache'] to be 'none'
- adjusted test_lookahead_helper_export_to_csv to catch the new catching of errors
- adjusted test_lookahead_helper_text_table_lookahead_analysis_instances to catch the new catching of errors
- changed lookahead_analysis.start result-reporting to show that not enough trades were caught including x of y
moved doc from utils.md to lookahead-analysis.md and modified it (unfinished)
added a check to automatically edit the config['backtest_cache'] to be 'none'
